US Bank M&A Activity to Continue Amid Increased Regulatory Scrutiny

January 10, 2022

Source: Fitch Ratings

Fitch Ratings-Chicago/New York-06 January 2022: Heightened political and regulatory scrutiny of large bank mergers and acquisitions (M&A) could lead to increased execution risk for future deals and for banks with in-process transactions, Fitch Ratings says. However, we expect small and mid-sized regional banks to continue to announce new deals despite growing regulatory scrutiny that could result in delayed closings or even the potential termination of deals.

Banks are expected to continue to pursue growth through acquisitions into 2022, driven by a desire for increased scale and enhanced franchise strength either through new geographies or by growing market share within their existing footprint. Moreover, increased scale can alleviate growing technology and compliance costs. Bank M&A has historically been neutral or negative for credit ratings over the near to medium term, mainly due to integration and execution risks. However, any ratings implications would be evaluated in the context of a bank's overall strategy, price paid and appropriateness of deal assumptions.

In July 2021, the administration issued an executive order demonstrating renewed interest in antitrust enforcement, with a specific mention of the Bank Merger Act of 1960. Politicians are increasingly debating the rules and regulations around bank mergers, with potential moratoriums on deals over $100 billion. Deals that could be impacted by such a moratorium include U.S. Bancorp’s acquisition of MUFG Union Bank; Bank of Montreal’s acquisition of Bank of the West, M&T Bank’s acquisition of People’s United Financial and Citizens Financial Group’s merger with Investors Bancorp. However, First Citizens/CIT and other deals have recently received approval.

To the extent an announced transaction is delayed, deals can lose momentum and waste firms’ time and resources, often at the expense of strategic plans and long-term goals. Failed mergers could also reduce potential earnings and ratings upside and may exacerbate key-person risk if management or staff seek opportunities elsewhere.

ma_transactions
Despite stepped up scrutiny, U.S. banks continued to announce new transactions throughout 2021, albeit with pricing moderating from the highs of the first half of the year. The median price to tangible book for bank acquisitions has been around 1.5x during 2021, which is above 2020 levels but in line with historical averages, while the associated average credit mark of 1.55%, which reflects expectations for future losses, is slightly above historical norms

Ratings considerations include potential integration risks associated with M&A, the strategic and financial benefits or detriments and an issuer’s track record of executing on prior transactions. Execution risks can be meaningful for M&A, with potential for technical integration issues and cultural disruption. The deal economics of many transactions rely on estimated cost reductions.

Mergers that provide appropriate risk-adjusted return on capital or provide enhancements to a bank's business profile can be supportive of credit in the long run. M&A can improve funding profiles, deposit franchises and cost of funds. These considerations can be meaningful for smaller regional banks lacking resources to fund increasing technology spending to overhaul legacy systems against a backdrop of growing cyber risk. Small and mid-sized regional banks, whose business lines, geographic and loan category concentrations and franchise strength vary considerably, may be more incentivized to pursue M&A either through a whole bank acquisitions or as a target themselves.

Contacts:
Christopher Wolfe
Managing Director, North American Banks
+1 212 908-0771
Fitch Ratings
300 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Brian Thies
Associate Director, North American Banks
+1 312 606-2316

Laura Kaster, CFA
Senior Director, Fitch Wire
North and South American Financial Institutions
+1 646 582-4497

Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212 908 0278, Email: sandro.scenga@thefitchgroup.com

The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.

All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: https://www.fitchratings.com/understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following https://www.fitchratings.com/rating-definitions-document details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders’ relevant interests are available at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory. Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website.

In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided 'as is' without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.

Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the 'NRSRO'). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the \'non-NRSROs\') and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

Copyright © 2022 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.

#3 -_ 1 (1)